Showing posts with label Opinions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opinions. Show all posts

Friday, March 22, 2013

What Are Agents Looking For?

Recently, Writers Digest inquired for submissions to writer's looking for agents. Ever the interested in Writer's Digest I looked upon the email and had to roll my eyes at some of the descriptions as to what they are looking for. 

Their specifics were a bit intimidating. Now, don't think I'm oblivious to brand. I get it. I really do. I also know it's really difficult to explain one's taste--i.e. I liked reading RR Martin, but not Tolkein. But trying to describe one as fantasy and the other as, well, something fantasyish with a darker story is like trying to describe how pinapple and coconut taste the same. 

What she's really saying is, please don't bore me with long-ass prose that goes nowhere--very politely. The funny thing is IMO -- both RR Marting and Tolkein wander a bit in their own right.  

Perhaps what I'm saying is I think agents trying to tell you what they want in a story can only go so far. It really is preference that you can't pin-point or nail down, only get a general feel for.  

Tuesday, September 25, 2012

How To Write A How To Article

Pet peeves.  This is one of them.  

I love How To articles.  For the most part they help.  But every now and again I come across a How to article that is so vague, non-descriptive and "fluffy" that I don't get it.  

Maybe that day was an "off" day, but really if you're going to tell me how to walk in a straight line I need more in a How To article than it saying--walk in a straight line.  


So here is my guide lines:

1. Have specific bullet points so you can focus on the "how to".

2. Get to the point.  Fading into obscure ideas blathering about non-specifics, not helpful.  Here's a clue--if the paragraph making your point is more than three sentences, your blathering.
 
3. If you need more than three sentences for a point--it should be it's own subject article.  Which gives you ideas for other posts!

4. If your bullet points needs bullet points then these things need there own how to posts. 

Can you tell all of these four points is saying the same thing in different ways?  

BE SPECIFIC! 

So many times I'll click a link that says how to...

Great catch, but then ten points that don't give specific's doesn't help me.  Telling me not to write poorly does not help.  How about specifics.  Here's how to not write poorly: 

1. Take out these words in a sentence: was, is, the, an, as, that, then, when, just, like, (there are more, but these are repeat offenders).

2.  If you must have any of the words above consider making two sentences, rearranging the sentence or reconstructing the sentence without any of those words.  If this is still not possible, it's possible they are needed, keep them.  

3.  To be clear and understood, use short sentences.  Where there is "and" in your sentence replace the "and" with a period.  Rework the two sentences to make sense.

That's just the start of How To Not Write Poorly.  But also, writing well and writing poorly is subjective.  So next time you think of using the How To...tag line, think about the vague notions you bullet point and think of all the nifty posts you can do by being specific!  
 
 

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Disrespect Of A Name?


How am I to respond to someone who puts extra syllables or twists my name into a slang term?  What makes a person slur a name?  Is it familiarity or disrespect?  

Why call me Sturf instead of using the exotic beautiful name Stephanie?  Stephy is even fine with me.  But contorting my name into some kind of familiarization that you don't have, I find, comes from a malice one wishes to hide.  
 
Perhaps it's meant to irritate, but why?  Perhaps it's meant to endear and I can understand that.  

People have a sense of who they are and their name is their own.  Mangling a name is like a desecration of who you are.  What ego gain is there by playing with syllables of a person's identity?

Perhaps I'm the only one who feels this way?  Tell me if I am.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Quotes I Could Kill


There's a saying I've always been annoyed with.  It's the "2 kinds of people in the world".  

It annoyed me because I always found it to be too definitive, cutting people on one side or the other.  There was always a third option.  Even if it was those that don't care.  

But I choose to see this saying in a different way.  If you choose to see the world in a classification of two kinds of people then the term needs to be broad or physical.  You are either my enemy or my friend.  You either agree with me or you don't.  You either own a gun or you don't.  

It's wonderful that there a more than two kinds of people in the world.  What starts people resenting others is division.  Division of us vs. them.  This could be why there are only "two" political parties.  Because people can't think in terms better than a crow?  (Crows can only count to three)  

No, because there are so many possibilities that it's hard to comprehend.  I have a certain amount of respect for those that think past "it's not possible".  Those are people that think past the restriction of only two paths.

Friday, June 15, 2012

The Wise Old Crone Is Talking To You

Men seek knowledge.  Women have wisdom.  It's interesting to see that men seek what they think women have.  Yet, why is it that no one listens to the wise crone?  There is one in every one of us. 

This could be the fourth time, this year, someone has asked me to "slap" them from making a mistake.  


I always do, but even when I make my observations they never take the advice.  Maybe they believe their way is right.  Maybe they can't see the train wreck coming.  Perhaps I don't bullet point the occurrences I see happening, but even when I do no one listens. 

When you seek out advice from the crone, this could be the reason why she speaks in riddles.  You're not going to listen to her anyways.  You're too close to the situation.  


If she were to speak the plain truth--you're future wife is Cthulhu.  Don't switch jobs, you'll be worse off than you are now.  Please don't lower your insurance--oops I'm sorry.  If I said these things, all it would do is hurt your feelings. 

One seeks the Crone to be justified.  Then blame the crone for not warning you.  Fantastic.  The secret to the Crone is, her knowledge is for HER benefit, not yours.  You know why?  Cause her knowledge was gained with wisdom.  Hard, life altering, painful school-of-hard-knocks learning wisdom.  Her lessons aren't your lessons. 

If you have the open mind to heed the crone, you're life could easily avoid soul crushing failure.  Maybe that's not better though.  You see, wisdom of the Crone is knowing enough to know she knows little, that others paths don't follow hers, everyone needs to learn the hard way, and they aren't going to listen anyway. 

So the next time you seek guidance, the next time you read the tarot, the next time you search for the right path, you must understand that this is your journey.  Each one is unique.  Each path is yours.  You have a Crone and it's your choice to listen.  

Thursday, June 7, 2012

I Believe That...

Inspired tribute to American Gods.  In a scene near the end of American Gods by Neil Gaiman, one of the characters explains what she believes in.  It's inspiring and awesome along with the book.  I highly recommend it!

I Believe That...
 
People can change if they want to but they can't change if someone else wants them to.

E-books and traditional publishing will still be around 100 years from now but traditional publishing might not be 200 years from now.

Planet earth is so far in the boondocks that it's going to take us humans to go visit for life in the center of the galaxy.

Another planet in the opposite end of the boondocks is wondering when we'll show up.

I could eat PBJ's for lunch every week day but maybe not every weekend.

You should take care of what you think in your head because it shapes your soul.

When I die I will be missed even if no one knows who I am.

Because the sky is blue and the grass is green I've adapted to love those colors as the epitome of health.

Crying is the soul bleeding and tears are poison that needs an outlet for one to heal.

Death is an adventure.

Righteousness is an eternal inheritance and Alucard will come for you one day.

Love is God, not the other way around.

Hell is not a place or a destination but your own personal nightmare that needs to be confronted before you gain true confidence.

Zack Fair is a sexy-ass whatever he is.

Marcus interferes with my life more often than I'd like to admit.

Fun is a requirement to live, otherwise you exist.

Google is the next American God.

Just because I talk to myself, doesn't make me crazy, it makes me sane.

Kindness should be sprinkled out liberally everyday so that this world doesn't become intolerable.

With Corso Riggs by my side, I will defeat Darth Vader.

Those who tell me to shut up are those I shouldn't bother talking with.

The safest place on earth is under a rainbow.

Reality is too constrictive when it comes to imagination and children.

Stephanie is the most beautiful girls name ever.

Opening your heart to yourself can be dangerous but worth the risk because if you don't it has no reason to beat.

Yak's spit to be funny.

No one can make you feel a certain way, but that doesn't give them license to hide behind when they try to hurt you or say something that's "truthful".

The Queen Chess piece should never be relied upon; she's a woman and can change her mind and sides.

Vegan's don't understand that this world is not fair, but I admire their choice, not because they are "superior" and don't eat meat but because going without something that the body needs for years takes beyond the will to live and longevity or a devil's worth of self loathing.  

X is the universal sign for "this is worth the booby-trap that might kill you."

Friday, April 20, 2012

I'm Ethical Because I'm a Greedy Capitalist

Of the seven sins greed might be the most hated of all.  Balancing these sins out Pride vs. Modesty, Lust vs. Chasity, Greed vs. Ethics but people tend to swing the needle all the way to the other side.  It becomes I'm not Prideful I'm Insecure.  I'm not Lustful I'm Celibate.  I'm not Greedy I'm...interesting that I can't find an all encompassing word for "giving everything away".  (Help me with that if you know one)
 
But wait...there's this guy you might have heard of, Greg Smith.  He's the one that publicly announced he finally noticed Goldman and Sach's was unethical in it's business dealings.  In his article he explained that when you don't have ethics, you don't have a business.  I agree.  Short term greed might get you money, but it won't get you wealth. 
 
The way success works in business is a good rapport with customers.  Customers give you money.  Treat your customers poorly, try to pull the wool over their eyes, grab their stash and run then you're not going to have a business for long, as Mr. Smith points out.  

Ethics are, in essence, necessary for sustained success.  Perhaps you've seen executives get away with it.  But my first reaction when I see businesses doing shady things is to not do business with them.  You don't trust them and the money flows away from them. 
 
"But everybody's doing it!"
 
No.  I refuse to believe there are no options.  I've found banks that never laid a finger on "junk loans".  I've work with business owners doing the right thing.  I have writers warning me not to cross a non-disclosure clause "because it would be wrong."  "Everybody's doing it"--is not the best excuse I've heard, just the most common.  If one can justify dumping morals to the way side then it's a life that hasn't been self-examined. 
 
Greg Smith's article points to one direction and that's ethics=success.  No matter how many stories you hear about bankers, traders or executives behaving badly, I'll always believe in ethics.  So if I genuinely care about my customers and their wants, if I seem more preoccupied with how I can help my fellow co-workers, or if I walk out on a deal that makes me uncomfortable because I don't feel it's right, then attest my ethics to my greed. 

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

The War Against E-books

Article titles reveal the vibe traditional-publishing feels about self-published authors and vice-verse.  You might think traditional-publishing are targeting E-Books, but really they are targeting Amazon and independent authors.  Also, the monkey flinging is just as rampant against traditional-publishing.  Here are some headlines I've seen lately;

"Is traditional Publishing Dead?", "Amazon A Threat To Society", this last one; "Staying Relevant Biggest Challenge to Publishers, Not E-Books" made me realize, yes, traditional publishing are launching nukes.  

If we can't have it no one will.  Yet this statement made by Marcus Leaver proves to me how far gone the higher ups have strayed from being relevant.  Here's a clue--E-Books ARE relevant.  Amazon reports 75% of their books sold are E-Books.  Amazon also has the lead as a reseller of books.  (Notice the period of that last statement--it's for real)
 
War is defined in the Stephanisms dictionary as "You want what I have and am going to take it from you."
 
That's what traditional publishing is saying.  the music industry tried the same thing.  Napster is killing us!  Stop buying pirated music!
 
Stop making me pay $15 for one song, then we'll talk. 
 
I've seen through the shrugs of authors saying, "that's the way publishing is."  One writer I know can't write what she wants to write because she's under contract to write what the marketers want her to write.  

Yes, she, her agent, her publisher all want to make money but this goes against what the same people tell her to write whats inside.  So, you want me to write sincerely, but you want me to write what you want me to write?  Also, one writer can crank out 3 books, 3 GREAT BOOKS, a year but her publisher won't let her--why?  Because of her contract.  One writer is not allowed to enter into a certain genre because it would be too competitive against another author they have.  

What buyers can't buy both?  Now I come to find agents put in a clause with writers saying if Agent#1 can't find a home for your book they make you shelf it.  If you part with that agent and find another that can sell your book Agent#2 AND Agent#1 get their 15% (which is 30% not given to the writer).  Does that seem right to you? "That's the way publishing is."  -- "That's the way that government is." -- "That's the way the DMV rolls." -- "That's the way..." No.  I point at that and say UNETHICAL.
 
Yes you worked your tushy off trying to sell that book but your going piss and moan and cry when someone better can sell the book?  Does the crappy sales guy that just couldn't help you get commission from the sales guy that did know what you were talking about, saved you hours looking and direct you to the product?  No.  Crappy sales guy gets fired. 
 
No wonder E-Books are kicking your ass.  Yes, I agree, there are a lot of crappy E-Books out there but still they are kicking your ass!  So instead of getting up, bringing your game to the customers the way they want it your trying to pull technology back?  Really?  

The Big 6 have the power to rise above it a kick the m***er-living-s**t out of E-Books and all your doing is crying on the pavement?  The way I see it traditional-publishing is being a doormat, an osterige, an armadillo, or my favorite--a pill bug. 
 
Despite my ramblings I want traditional publishing to rise above a be successful.  I'm one of those that nods my head and say, "I can see that" when I find out something wacky about publishing.  

But the fact that they are waging war against the entrepreneurs that are making leaps and bounds by technology is looking more like suicide.  Traditional publishing takes offense that technology is bringing more readers in and by passing them to get to what they want because it's convenient?  Is this what I'm seeing?  

I saw a report that 50% of books are impulse buys.  So why not take the information and apply it.  Your being dumb-asses and your forcing everyone to choose sides and really if you want to see the future, look at the music industry, look at the Motion picture writer's strike.  The future is a repeat of the past if you don't learn from it. 

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

If It Wasn't Hard, It Wouldn't Be Worth It

As of late, I've been reading blogs about how hard it is to get a manuscript traditionally published.  (Long pause and a sigh inserted here.)

I've been reading so many that I've gotten weary of posts titled "How I got my agent".  The first three paragraphs explain how hard the author worked, how many doubts they had, how they were ready to turn back, how they asked themselves everyday "is this really what I want to do?", and also asked "why is so hard to find an agent?".

I'm starting to shy away from the "how I got my agent" advise.  Where's the fun?  Where's the adventures?  I don't want to know how you got your agent because it's like trying to solicit for a best friend.  Every story is different--yet everyone seems to have tremendous doubts about getting one.  

Where are the people that say this journey is amazing!  Oh, sure those posts say it at the end to keep the subject on a light note but the whole rest of the article is just a downer about the industry as a whole.  I don't want to concentrate about the industry as a whole.  If your personal legeng is to be published then wonderful!  I'm tired of woe-was-me stories and it turns out that published aurthors have more pressure than ever and STILL they say it's the best job in the world--GREAT!  Tell me those best job in the world stories!  

Why focus on the negative aspects when there is so much good about writing?  I'm sick of woe-stories.  So I'll give you a happy story instead.  Girl writes in diary.  Girl decides she likes writing.  Girl writes novel and goes to workshops to improve her writing.  Teacher tells girl she sucks but girl doesn't get upset.  Instead girl listens to teacher on how to make her WIP better.  Girl happily writes while researching HOW she's going to get published.  

Now a skilled writer will put in the inciting incident and the antagonist but you'll find girl is not insecure or worried because what will be, will be and you see girl swooshing aside negativity, rejection and doubt because she believes in herself.  Might be a boring story, but as I said a skilled writer could make it interesting.  Which the writer's I subscribe to are talented.  So hop to it guys!  There's a challenge.  Make it interesting but make your hero NOT insecure! 

Monday, November 21, 2011

Will Traditional Publishing Become The Niche Market?

Nathan Bransford's vote-post and everyone's replies got me thinking about the future of traditional publishing.  Writer after writer said either:
 
1) They want to pursue traditional publishing and are considering self-publishing if traditional publishing doesn't work.

or

2) They plan on bypassing traditional publishing.

or

3) They need help from a publisher to get to their audience and make their book the best it can be. 
 
Since anyone can brand themselves in any genre for self-publishing maybe the way publishers will go are "niche" markets.  Maybe the big five will coincide with Romance, Fantasy, Noir/Thriller, Non-Fiction and Technical.  

Traditional publishers might see self-published authors as a “test” market.  I’ve been hearing it’s all about platform and sales for the self-made authors.  I can see traditional publishing making their money because they have the power to take an author world-wide.  Yet all of this is possible without traditional publishing.  I think it depends on one thing:
 
What kind of professionals do you want around you? 
 
Do you want someone with a reputation of a traditional publisher that’s been tried and tested?  Or are you willing to do the re-search about the people you surround yourself with to produce your book?  Do want to build your team?  Or have one ready and waiting?
 
The way it looks, traditional publishers might want to wait for the self-publishers to build their readership then take them aboard.  It’s a great way to prove an author knows how to sell.  Still a team working with you OR for you is the only separation I can see from way over here.  I’m just spouting off—this whole thing is just a mystery until I claw deeper into the mind of the beast.  

Friday, October 28, 2011

Good Intentions, Bad Outcome

The road to hell is paved by good intentions.  I can't be blamed if my intentions were good, right?  My heart was in the right place.  I didn't mean to.

These are phrases to absolve one of responsibility.  I'm not going to say intentions don't matter.  They are what got the ball rolling in the first place.  But when the rubble has cleared and damage done, intentions aren't material and they don't give you a lick of an excuse. 

Intentions don't matter between life and death.  But too often the outcome is excused because of intent (Those police officers didn't mean to storm into the wrong house and kill the owner).  If your lucky and the damage can be reversed or dampened, that is the only possible redemption.  Accepting the excuse of intention is refusing responsibility. 

This train of thought has me thinking.  I don't like that it is true, but it is.  Intention is a thought that is then put forth into action.  The outcome of the intention is action.  For instance if I was a sculpture and intended to make a vase but the outcome was a cup that would be the wrong intention, but it doesn't matter because the outcome was a cup.  My heart was there but the outcome just didn't make it. 

What would you do?  Try again attempting to learn from the experience?  Stop sculpting?  In disappointment break the cup and throw it away?  Those are all actions from intent as well. 
To discipline a dog actions are rewarded or repremanded.  But I know a few good trainers that say, "change the thought". 

Thoughts are the product of intention.  Changing the thought changes the intention and thereby changes the action.  Punishing or rewarding intention (or a thought) isn't all that unknown.  Trials on hate crimes do that.  But judging the intent of a person is the wrong way to go about it.  Judging on intent is wrong because the outcome can be extremely different from the intent.  (Just like my friend meant to get me hot chocolate but poured coffee in with the powdered formula and gave me a coffee mocha).  Yet training your own mind to change your intent, (like replacing negative thoughts with positive ones) can change the outcome.  But it's the outcome that needs to be judged not the intent.  Why? Because intent and outcome can be vastly different. 

If the outcome is not intended, responsibility still needs to be assumed good or bad.  The only way I know of to combat a bad outcome is knowledge.  Learn from intentions that turn out bad or good.  It's one of the most difficult things to take responsibility for because you didn't mean for it to happen.  But the worst happened and it was because of an action taken. 

To stand and say this was my fault takes courage when things go awry.  Yet the term "my intentions were good" doesn't fly with me.  If you can give me a reason why intent should be considered in an outcome I'd like to hear it.  This is a subject I'm not able to see both sides on.  If I started the chain of events to make something bad happen, then I need to take responsibility for it.  Mistakes happen.  Intenent and action don't always line up.  But not taking responsibility for it is immaturity.  Immaturity is a downfall of good intentions.  Immaturity leads to more bad outcomes.  Taking responsibility can stop short that path to hell.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

The Steve Jobs I Knew...

Saw this post and thought...This is the Steve Jobs I knew!  He was an ass...and we LOVED him for it!


I still curse him for his "you must do it my way!" but hey Gene Marks has a point!

Monday, October 24, 2011

Letting Go Of Insecure Social-ability

An animal’s rank determines how it interacts with others, when it eats, where it drinks, how many times it must play sentry and what it's responsible for.  

People are ranked by status--what kind of social influence they command, how much money they have or what skill they can offer.  

When an animal doesn't know its rank it goes into anxiety ridden psychosis.  Apparently when a person doesn't know its rank it marches up to Wall Street.  But I see that more as a problem with over-estimating their rank.  

One might fail to comprehend that common doesn't mean bland or unimportant.  Common people have majority.  They are the bulk of the herd.  There is nothing wrong with that.  Usually the majority of the herd have a pretty cushy life.  They get a good meal, they are protected by their peers in case of attack, and they are the "normal" in social interaction.  What it boils down to is security in your social-ability means you know your place in this world.  

If you want to raise it, then do so.  There is still a place for unique among the common.  One doesn't have to be exclusively one or the other.  Abraham Lincoln--a common man.  Martin Luter King--a common man.  Yet they were unique in that they knew their place in this world and what they wanted to do.  That's my example for those who ask, "How do you rise above?" 

It's really okay if my face book page doesn't have over 5,000 friends.  I'm not sure I could keep up with that many.  And I'm not insulted if you haven't read every post or responded to every blurb.  These are just pages in a diary of a common life.  Sometimes what makes a life extraordinary is how it's told.  I ride horses vs. the stories of "The Little Boot That Couldn't" or "We Never Get Past The Smiley Faces" are common because they are everyday life.  I KNOW you have a story much like one of those.  So you see I'm common too.  

Those who don't want a common life just need to see theirs in a different point of view.  I'll tell you I have a boring life and in the same breath tell you I ride an un-commonly large 19 hand horse everyday.  Is that common?  For me yes!  For you maybe not so much.  But really this idea that you must have "a well paying job" or a skill that everybody needs, or know everybody on the planet seems more like fun goals than a social need.  

More to the point what you need is knowing where you stand to let go of the insecurities of social pressures you place on yourself.  It takes knowing who you are and what you want.  Knowing that is the ladder for getting there.  If it's on the backs of society it's not really you getting what you want it's relying on the efforts of others.  

But there is one thing you might not think of.  It's okay not to have every gadget on earth.  It's okay to be low man on the totem pole.  Low man doesn't mean worthless (which is the problem I perceive as to why no-one wants to be "the last").  Here's a story that will illustrate my point.
 
Studying wolves brought me to a case of a pack of 5.  We will call them Brutus, the leader. Nu-nu, his mate.  Sentry, the one who stayed watch most the time. Scout, the successful hunter and then there was Goofball.

This was a common pack.  Iconic stern leader with a mate as tough as nails but sweet.  A loyal side-kick with mettle, a wiry un-detectable scout and comic relief that was a complete and utter mess.  All of these traits are common and each one knew who they were and what role they played.  I've listed them from top rank to bottom in order.  Brutus being the "top dog".

You could say it was a condensed version of a king, a queen and their subjects.  The "low man" and most common of them all was Goofball.  He had no amazing nose to seek out food.  He wasn't faster than the others; he wasn't great at sneaking up on prey.  In fact one day when they went out during a winter hunt he eagerly pounced too soon and spooked the herd making their efforts worthless.  Then it was an ostracizing session--a horrible display of why you always listen to the leader ensued and Goofball came out with half his left ear gone.  

Goofball got back into Brutus' good graces by "dancing", pup barking and tossing his part of their successful kill (to which Goofball only received the skin to eat) around in a helicopter motion.  Goofball would screw-up regularly but had that common trait of making everyone laugh.  One day Goofball's antics got him in trouble and he never came back to the pack.  

The four searched for him for three days.  On the fourth, fifth and sixth night of his loss they sang his lament.  Goofball was not skilled; he was low man on the totem pole and the most common of all wolves in a common wolf pack.  And he was sorely missed.  So It wasn't his un-impressive skills as a hunter it was his "social security" of his place in the world that made him loved.  

He was last and knew it and he was fine with that.  In fact, when Brutus was in one of his bad moods Goofball was the only one who could come near him.  It was his last place social status that allowed it.  The most submissive was no threat to Brutus and often made him "laugh".  

So think about it--are you starving or do you just feel jealous that you don't have everything that the Jones' have?  Humans need shelter, food, and water to live on.  Companionship is easily found.  Anything more than that is a bonus not necessity. 

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Audible Short Story: The Ghosts of Ragged-Ass Gulch by Bill Pronzini Narrated by Nick Sullivan

Nick Sullivan has the perfect sound as a detective.  He really made the story very rich with his Bogart swagger voice!  The story felt in-between a scooby-doo episode and an old detective mystery.  I went along with it saying to myself, "Hey Steph, you got it for free and who can resist that voice?"  But I started liking the story more because of the supporting main character, Carrie.  She was a hoot!  Her character put a lot of life into the story.

The mystery wasn't complicated and had all the good writing necessary for a short but I felt it lacked that certain spark to make me want to be a devoted fan.  Yet all-in-all the short did it's job.  I'm going to look up more of Bill Pronzini's other works because of this one.  It was an entertaining 1 1/2 hours and well worth the time and price of admission! 

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Audiobook review: Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean M. Auel narrated by Sandra Burr

As a writer I see various different sections that could have been handled better throughout the book yet I admire the foretelling, the pace, and Mrs. Auel's storytelling ability.  As a reader, I found this book just as unique and moving as I did when I read it at fifteen though I remembered the overall story.  Ayla is an inspiring heroine without being overpowering or losing her femininity.  The story intrigued me at the beginning, crescent in the the middle and came to the authors full meaning at the last two hours.  Mrs. Auel's thoughts about the stone-age make the story and her point drive home with Creb's (a main character) insights.  The divide between clan and "the others" is firm, each character had their own voice and the plot was built up greater and greater till the last bomb at the end.  Style was great -- Mrs. Auel has a definite voice. 

Now for what readers can understand--this book was fun, entertaining and extremely unique to any book I've ever read or ever will read I suspect.  And I mean unique by it has nothing to do with sci-fi either.  It's refreshing from other historical books as it's set in the stone-age.  I liked the book even though, and I quote another reviewers comment, "Ayla (the main character) discovers everything aside from cold fusion...".  She (Auel) gets you into the culture and life of her world that could have very well been a real occurrence.  It's a must read.  I didn't rate it higher only because of technical writing issues even my amateur eye caught, not because the story was not fully integrative.  I plan on reading the next in the series -- or "remember" it as I listen to it again anyway! 

Friday, May 13, 2011

Movie Review: THOR

Is it bad that I identify more with Loki?  Even after seeing it twice I still think Thor has much to learn about life.  If it weren't for Loki, Thor would not have reached his full potential.  As Loki might not have reached his full potential without Thor.

If you don't know the rivalry of Thor and Loki you might want to get versed.  It's a fantastic story.  They say you have to have a great "bad guy" to make the hero.  I'd say Tom Hiddleston was a brilliant Loki.  Probably why I went to see it twice.

Seeing one of my all time favorite under-dogs come to life was worth the ache in my ears for wearing those 3D glasses.

The humor is great and not overdone.  The story was told really well and it has this charm about the whole movie that I'm definitely going to study as a writer.   

Monday, May 9, 2011

Book Opinion: Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter

Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter
Narrated by Scott Holst

I was actually not interested in reading Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter but the voice of Scott Holst could not be denied.  I'm leaning more and more to audiobooks because I can "read" during my commute.  I love reading a story but my eyes wander on the page sometimes and I've been known to skip over important passages.  Also, who doesn't love to be read to?

I'm finding I'm not as selective with the purchases of audiobooks, now purchasing audiobooks I've already read (with my eyes), because I have a narrator I can hear.  Now I think, oh--10 hours?  That's 7 days of commute time.  Suddenly 1,000 page books don't scare me!  A book changes when the words are spoken outloud.  This was also the case for this particular audiobook.  I don't think I would have been that interested in reading the book.  But when listening, it came alive. 

What really had me was the description and setting in the beginning.  I could see the old fading town.  I had a grasp on how life was.  It got more interesting from there.  Some might find the first pages boring, but it really did take off after you understood that vampires are real! 

Abraham Lincoln; Vampire Hunter has the feel of a memoir.  I really felt that Abe was the second narrator of the story.  Facts of his life coaleased with the fiction of Seth Grahame-Smith's storytelling.  I don't know about the accuracy as I'm no Civil war historian, but I feel as though there was a great deal of research put into this book.  Seth respectfully and tastefully wove this story to make me think, you know...that would make sense.

My only one question I had at the end was -- who were the eleven names on the note?  I can justify everything else to, why did Henry chose him to write the book?  To, how did Henry convince Abe to hand over the journals? 

I would recommend this book to those who like memiors, those who like history and vampires mixed together, and those who have studied the 16th president.  It's a slow pace book but by no means did it let go of my attention.

View all my reviews

Friday, April 22, 2011

I Abide By Nature

Photo by Donald Weller
Until we can make nature ours and control the tides, the wind, raging fires, the motion of the earth, the rotation of the sun, the order of our solar system, and the shape of our universe, we must abide by the unfair, unyielding and cruel forces of nature.

The strongest AND most adaptable survive.  No governmental system, no forced rule, no will of another can circumvent this.  Seeking charity corrupts man's ability to survive natures way, but accepting good-will from another is a gift to both the giver and receiver.  Learn from natures government.  We are not insects.  To compare mammals to a drone is folly in dealing with what truly drives a human being.

Rise beyond emotion's control is what we can learn from bugs.  Yet we have the power to move as one and achieve as one but not because we are similar or are forced.  I see a world that drives itself in many directions and I see this way as chaos.  Yet chaos is another form of order--the order of destruction.

In itself, decay is beautiful and the ebb and flow of natures way presides.  You cannot escape her.  You do not pass go, you do not collect $200.  Unless of course you're a pet.  And for that money you sell yourself short.  Is that all you're worth?

Sheep are food.  Accept this as your fate to be cared for if you will.  It's difficult to tell the difference between a sheepdog and a wolf.  My eyes are set in front of my head.  Call me wolf or call me sheepdog it makes no difference to me.  I abide by nature.  

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Audiobook review: Stone of Tears by Terry Goodkind

Here's the book synopsis:
An Epic of Awesome Power Kahlan has at last gained the one goal she had always thought was beyond her grasp ... love. Against all odds, the ancient bonds of secret oaths, and the dark talents of men long dead, Richard has won her heart. Amid sudden and disastrous events, Richard's life is called due to satisfy those treacherous oaths. To save his life, Kahlan must forsake Richard's love and cast him into the chains of slavery, knowing there could be no sin worse than such a betrayal. Richard is determined to unlock the secrets bound in the magic of ancient oaths and to again be free. Kahlan, alone with the terrible truth of what she has done, must set about altering the course of a world thrown into war. But even that may be easier than ever winning back the heart of the only man she will ever love.

My take:

The short version--Terry Goodkind is a powerful author and has done a fantastic job of entertaining us!

SPOILERS WARNING
Only hit the "read more" or look down if you already have read the book or don't mind spoilers.

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Googles Alexandria

Griffith Observatory's Tesla Coil
Google's attempt to bring all the books of the world into one digitized search engine failed last week due to a ruling of one judge.  There's an entire story of the battle between Google and the authors guild but I wanted to explore more into the project itself.

Google would have taken every book, except those that authors opted out of, and made passages of those books searchable.  Does that mean the whole book is searchable?  Does that mean that you can bootleg any book?  It already happens, I know, and reading the whole book on your search engine would be ridiculous but it would be possible.

If your thinking no way, then tell me how Thomas Guide is doing against Google maps?  (Or do you know what the Thomas Guide is?  Well then I guess I've dated myself.)  Why do I need a Garmin if my phone can spit out step-by-step driving instructions via Google?  And what if people look for information on the internet and get half a passage thinking they "know it all".  A whole book was published about the subject you're researching.  There must have been a reason aside from it was before the internet.

I can see the appeal to recreating Alexandria so knowledge can be abound but I also know about how the greatest harm can come from the best intentions.  Now let's look at the other side.  I realize that you could potentially get an out-of-print obscure book to become popular and everyone enjoys  a phoenix from the ashes.  I also see a lot of authors opting out of the digitizing project.  I'm wondering, what kind of benefits or plunders do you think would happen?